Skip to main content

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://developer.alterscope.org/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

​
Alterscope vs Pyth Pro

PlatformCategoryCoverageRisk analyticsVault and oracle depthPublic APISources
AlterscopeInstitutional DeFi data infrastructureVault, oracle, curator, peg, graph, and scenario dataFactors, SHAP, Monte Carlo, HRP, DSR, meta-oracle healthOracle classification plus vault and curator riskYesreview/developer-api/04-competitive-positioning.md:31; review/developer-api/05-monetization-roadmap.md:9-18
Pyth ProInstitutional precision price feeds120+ first-party providers and 100+ blockchainsNo vault risk decomposition identifiedUltra-low-latency price feedsREST/WebSocket APIshttps://docs.pyth.network/price-feeds; https://docs.pyth.network/price-feeds/pro/faq; https://legacy.pyth.network/pyth-price-feeds
Pyth Pro, previously known as Lazer, is the closest category comparable because it proves institutions pay for precision data. Pyth’s public docs position Pro as subscription-based price data for institutions and advanced use cases, with ultra-low latency, customizable channels, and dedicated support. Alterscope is broader. It does not try to beat Pyth at producing precision market prices. It wraps vaults, oracles, curators, peg history, knowledge graph, simulation, and risk events into an agentic-first API. Pyth gives a fast feed. Alterscope tells your vault, risk, or AI system what that feed means for the position.

Start with a Free key

Test the broader vault, oracle, and curator data surface.